
GRE阅读真题第71段
The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, ratified in 1868, prohibits state governments from denying citizens the “equal protection of the laws.” Although precisely what the framers of the amendment meant by this equal protection clause remains unclear, all interpreters agree that the framers’ immediate objective was to provide a constitutional warrant for the Civil Rights Act of 1866, which guaranteed the citizenship of all persons born in the United States and subject to United States jurisdiction. This declaration, which was echoed in the text of the Fourteenth Amendment, was designed primarily to counter the Supreme Court’s ruling in Dred Scott v. Sandford that Black people in the United States could be denied citizenship. The act was vetoed by President Andrew Johnson, who argued that the Thirteenth Amendment, which abolished slavery, did not provide Congress with the authority to extend citizenship and equal protection to the freed slaves. Although Congress promptly overrode Johnson’s veto, supporters of the act sought to ensure its constitutional foundations with the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment. The broad language of the amendment strongly suggests that its framers were proposing to write into the Constitution not a laundry list of specific civil rights but a principle of equal citizenship that forbids organized society from treating any individual as a member of an inferior class. Yet for the first eight decades of the amendment’s existence, the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the amendment betrayed this ideal of equality. In the Civil Rights Cases of 1883, for example, the Court invented the “state action” limitation, which asserts that “private” decisions by owners of public accommodations and other commercial business to segregate their facilities are insulated from the reach of the Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantee of equal protection under the law. After the Second World War, a judicial climate more hospitable to equal protection claims culminated in the Supreme Court’s ruling in Brown v. Board of Education that racially segregated schools violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Two doctrines embraced by the Supreme Court during this period extended the amendment’s reach. First, the Court required especially strict scrutiny of legislation that employed a “suspect classification,” meaning discrimination against a group on grounds that could be construed as racial. This doctrine has broadened the application of the Fourteenth Amendment to other, nonracial forms of discrimination, for while some justices have refused to find any legislative classification other than race to be constitutionally disfavored, most have been receptive to arguments that at least some nonracial discriminations, sexual discrimination in particular, are “suspect” and deserve this heightened scrutiny by the courts. Second, the Court relaxed the state action limitation on the Fourteenth Amendment, bringing new forms of private conduct within the amendment’ s reach.GRE阅读文章解析
第一段第一句 :
The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, ratified in 1868, prohibits state governments from denying citizens the “equal protection of the laws.” 白话版讲解: 1868 年批准的美国宪法第十四条修正案禁止州政府不给予公民获得“平等法律保护”的权利。(第十四条修正案要求州政府不得拒绝给予任何人以平等法律保护 。) (当时的美国社会还存在奴隶制,黑人没有公民权,得不到法律的保护。)第二句 :
Although precisely what the framers of the amendment meant by this equal protection clause remains unclear, all interpreters agree that the framers’ immediate objective was to provide a constitutional warrant for the Civil Rights Act of 1866, which guaranteed the citizenship of all persons born in the United States and subject to United States jurisdiction. 白话版讲解: 尽管人们并不知道这条修正案的制定者们眼中的这条平等保护条款真正意味着什么,但所有对这条修正案进行解读的人都认为,制定者们当初最迫切的目标,是为 《1866 年民权法案》提供宪法层面的担保。《1866 年民权法案》确保了所有出生在美国的公民都会受到美国法律的管制。第三句 :
This declaration, which was echoed in the text of the Fourteenth Amendment, was designed primarily to counter the Supreme Court’s ruling in Dred Scott v. Sandford that Black people in the United States could be denied citizenship. 白话版讲解: 这一宣言(也就是人人都有获得“平等法律保护”的权利)在第十四条修正案中重复了数次。一开始,这条宣言是为了驳斥美国最高法院对于斯科特诉桑福德案的审判结果。这一审判结果认为,在美国生活的黑人并不拥有公民权。第四句 :
The act was vetoed by President Andrew Johnson, who argued that the Thirteenth Amendment, which abolished slavery, did not provide Congress with the authority to extend citizenship and equal protection to the freed slaves. 白话版讲解: 这条法案(即《1866 年民权法案》)受到安德鲁·约翰逊总统(President Andrew Johnson)的否决。他认为第十三条修正案里虽然禁止了奴隶制,但并没有赋予国会权力,让其能够给予自由的黑人公民权,以及平等的保护。第五句 :
Although Congress promptly overrode Johnson’s veto, supporters of the act sought to ensure its constitutional foundations with the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment. 白话版讲解: 尽管国会很快推翻了约翰逊总统的否决,但支持这条法案的人希望它能够在宪法层面有据可循,因此通过了第十四条修正案。第二段第一句 :
The broad language of the amendment strongly suggests that its framers were proposing to write into the Constitution not a laundry list of specific civil rights but a principle of equal citizenship that forbids organized society from treating any individual as a member of an inferior class. 白话版讲解: 第十四条修正案的用词抽象,概括性强,这说明这条修正案的制定者想要写进宪法的不是一条条具体的民事权利,而是人人都能获得平等公民权的基本原则。这条原则禁止社会把任一群体的任一成员当成是下等人来对待。第二句 :
Yet for the first eight decades of the amendment’s existence, the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the amendment betrayed this ideal of equality. 白话版讲解: 但是,在这条修正案批准之后的前 80 年里,最高法院对它的解读却背叛了平等的原则。第三句 :
In the Civil Rights Cases of 1883, for example, the Court invented the “state action” limitation, which asserts that “private” decisions by owners of public accommodations and other commercial business to segregate their facilities are insulated from the reach of the Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantee of equal protection under the law. 白话版讲解: 例如,美国最高法院在 1883 年处理的几件民权案件中,法院提出了“政府行为限制”的说法,认为公共场所和企业做出的的“私人”种族隔离行为并不受到第十四条修正案的管制。 (法院的判决推理是,第十四条修正案只禁止州政府实施种族歧视,而不适用于私人公民或企业。第十四修正案没有授权国会制定法律来处理私人公民或企业的种族歧视。)第三段第一句 :
A fter the Second World War, a judicial climate more hospitable to equal protection claims culminated i n the Supreme Court’s ruling in Brown v. Board of Education that racially segregated schools violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. 白话版讲解: 在第二次世界大战之后,一种更有利于“人人有权获得平等保护”的司法思潮在最高法院对布朗诉托皮卡教育局案的判决中达到了顶峰,该判决认为实行种族隔离的学校违反了第十四条修正案中的平等保护条款。第二句 :
Two doctrines embraced by the Supreme Court during this period extended the amendment’s reach. 白话版讲解: 在此期间,最高法院信奉的两大原则扩大了第十四条修正案的管制范围。第三句 :
First, the Court required especially strict scrutiny of legislation that employed a “suspect classification,” meaning discrimination against a group on grounds that could be construed as racial. 白话版讲解: 第一条,法院要求严格检查涉及到对人进行“可疑分类”的法律,这也就意味着针对某个群体进行区别对待在某种程度上来说就可以看成是一种种族歧视。 (19 世纪美国出现了“隔离但平等”的现象,各州以“非裔美国人”和“欧裔美国人”之名将黑人和白人从空间上分割开来,避免产生接触。这是一种种族歧视表现,但在 1896 年,美国最高法院在普莱西诉弗格森案中裁决这种做法符合美国宪法。)第四句 :
This doctrine has broadened the application of the Fourteenth Amendment to other, nonracial forms of discrimination, for while some justices have refused to find any legislative classification other than race to be constitutionally disfavored, most have been receptive to arguments that at least some nonracial discriminations, sexual discrimination in particular, are “suspect” and deserve this heightened scrutiny by the courts. 白话版讲解: 这一原则将第十四条法案的适用范围扩大到了其他非种族形式的歧视行为上。 尽管一些法官认为,除了对人从种族上进行分类(种族歧视)之外,其它对人进行分类的方式都不算违反宪法,但大部分法官都认为至少某些非种族形式的歧视,尤其是性别歧视,是 ”值得怀疑的“,因此需要法院非常 仔细的调查。第五句 :
Second, the Court relaxed the state action limitation on the Fourteenth Amendment, bringing new forms of private conduct with in the amendment’ s reach. 白话版讲解: 第二条,最高法院放宽了针对第十四条修正案提出的“政府行为限制”,从而将私人的歧视行为也纳入了第十四条修正案的管制范围。GRE阅读题目解析
1. Which of the following best describes the main idea of the passage? A. By presenting a list of specific rights, framers of the Fourteenth Amendment were attempting to provide a constitutional basis for broad judicial protection of the principle of equal citizenship. B. Only after the Supreme Court adopted the suspect classification approach to reviewing potentially discrimination legislation was the applicability of the Fourteenth Amendment extended to include sexual discrimination. C. Not until after the Second World War did the Supreme Court begin to interpret the Fourteenth Amendment in a manner consistent with the principle of equal citizenship that it expresses. D. Interpreters of the Fourteenth Amendment have yet to reach consensus with regard to what its framers meant by the equal protection clause. E. Although the reluctance of judges to extend the reach of the Fourteenth Amendment to nonracial discrimination has betrayed the principle of equal citizenship, the Supreme Court’s use of the state action limitation to insulate private activity from the amendment’s reach has been more harmful.






文章作者

TD福利 & 领取方式
TD教研组除了为大家准备了GRE阅读真题外,还准备了GRE其他考试备考资料,清单如下,进群免费下载:
扫码下方二维码,添加马甲微信,发送暗号「 GRE干货」即可免费入群哦~
注:已经添加马甲微信的同学就不用重复添加啦~
2020申请季,备考路上TD陪你一起前行

推荐阅读
?GRE写作Argument 为何总拿不到高分?原来中了这些坑!2022版GRE写作全题库免费下载 ?GRE阅读真题及答案及解析:Passage 67-GRE阅读真题免费下载 ?GRE数学总是拿不到满分?这三大类思维误区可能影响了你的做题思路! ?GRE单词复习常见的3个误区,你知道吗?-GRE单词背诵的3个小技巧 ?GRE数学如何备考才能拿高分?学会读题,做题速度直接快一半- GRE派 微信号:gh_de50d3f392f5
- *侵权请邮件联系563067852@qq.com,安排删除。